by Sarah P. Long
Masters thesis, University of North Carolina, 1986.
Hypothesis accepted: Facing the front of books toward the browser increases circulation over spine front display.
Experiment supporting hypothesis
Location: Parkwood Branch of Durham (North Carolina) Public Library
Groups:
- Experimental group: 150, at least four months old, adult current fiction already shelved near the front of library and marked with red dots on spine so shelvers would display these books face-out
- Control group: 150, at least four months old, adult current fiction already shelved near the front of library and marked with yellow dots on circulation cards
- Pre-test period: Measurement of two-months circulation for both groups displayed spine out
- Test period: Measurement of two-months circulation with experimental group displayed face-front and control group displayed spine-front
The average number of circulations per book for face-front displays increased 43%. Spine-front displays decreased 22% average number of circulations per book. Sarah Long's tracking of the weekly circulation of both groups clearly shows a dramatic increase in circulation when books were faced front.
Since face-front and spine-front books were displayed on the same shelves, increasing selection of face-front books drew attention from the spine-front books and reduced circulation from the latter.